Charlie Kirk’s Bail-Out Quip on Paul Pelosi Attacker Confirmed in New Fact Check

Lead A fact-check by Nur Ibrahim confirms that conservative influencer Charlie Kirk joked about bailing out the man who attacked Paul Pelosi in 2022, challenging widespread internet claims in a segment released today, September 11, 2025.

Nut Graf The report clarifies that during his October 31, 2022, podcast, Kirk sarcastically urged “some amazing patriot” in San Francisco to post bail for David DePape-who broke into former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s home and assaulted her husband-while simultaneously condemning the attack as “awful.” This revelation underscores how political figures’ past remarks continue to resurface amid renewed debates over political violence.

Bail-Out Banter and Context

• October 2022 Attack: DePape struck Paul Pelosi with a hammer during a home invasion motivated by conspiracy theories, fracturing his skull and prompting both state and federal charges.
• Podcast Remarks: At around the 52:50 mark of The Charlie Kirk Show, Kirk quipped that if DePape’s bail-estimated at $30,000-$40,000-were posted, an “amazing patriot” could become a “midterm hero,” despite acknowledging the assault’s severity.

Political Violence and Double Standards Kirk contrasted DePape’s treatment with cases in Chicago and San Francisco where violent offenders often secure immediate release, implicitly criticizing what he framed as selective application of justice when high-profile figures are targeted.

Impact and Reaction The fact-check arrives on the heels of Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10 on a Utah campus, reigniting national discourse on political aggression. Analysts note that revisiting Kirk’s past comments on the Pelosi attack highlights the complexities of condemning violence while scrutinizing the rhetoric of prominent activists.

Subhead: Continuing Debate over Rhetoric and Responsibility As the nation grapples with another tragic act of political violence, attention has turned back to how public figures discuss-and sometimes downplay-earlier incidents. Kirk’s quip, though delivered in sarcasm, is now cited by critics who argue that volatile commentary can both reflect and fuel divided climates.