Oxford Union President-Elect Sparks Backlash Over Celebratory Comments on Charlie Kirk Shooting

Oxford, UK - Oxford Union president-elect George Abaraonye posted celebratory remarks after conservative activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot at Utah Valley University on Wednesday, triggering widespread condemnation and an immediate apology.

Abaraonye’s impulsive social media reaction, captured in screenshots circulated online, raised urgent questions about political discourse and free-speech responsibilities within student societies.

Nut Graf

The controversy underscores tensions between robust debate and the line against endorsing political violence. As the incoming leader of one of the world’s most prestigious debating societies, Abaraonye’s comments provoked rebukes from across the political spectrum and forced the Oxford Union to distance itself from his sentiments.

What Happened

George Abaraonye reportedly wrote in an Oxford Union WhatsApp group, “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s go,” and shared an Instagram post saying, “Charlie Kirk got shot loool”. The remarks were deleted after Abaraonye learned of Kirk’s passing.

Reactions and Condemnation

The Oxford Union issued a statement condemning all forms of political violence and clarifying that the president-elect’s views did not represent its leadership.

• “We would like to unequivocally condemn the reported words and sentiments … Our condolences lie with Charlie Kirk’s family,” the Union declared.
• Commentators from university officials to Conservative politicians decried the comments as unacceptable in a forum dedicated to civil discourse.

Apology and Context

Abaraonye apologized, admitting he “reacted impulsively” and expressing regret that his reaction overshadowed his respect for victims of political violence. He referenced Kirk’s controversial positions on gun rights, Gaza, and civil-rights legislation as context for his initial shock.

Broader Implications

The incident has reignited debate over social media conduct by public figures and student leaders. Critics warn that celebrating violence erodes trust in debate institutions, while supporters argue for distinction between personal expression and institutional endorsement.

Oxford Union’s swift response and Abaraonye’s apology aim to contain the fallout ahead of his term beginning Hilary Term 2026. The episode serves as a reminder that in today’s digital age, off-the-cuff remarks can have lasting reputational consequences.