Charlie Kirk Doxxing Site Goes Dark After Flood of Submissions

Lead The anonymously operated “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” website, which amassed nearly 30,000 posts targeting individuals accused of celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination, went offline Monday amid mounting backlash.

Nut Graf Launched last weekend to spotlight social media comments perceived as celebrating the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the site’s abrupt shutdown underscores tensions over digital doxxing and free speech in the wake of political violence.

Site Launch and Purpose The site debuted Saturday under an Icelandic privacy registration, promising a searchable database of submissions filterable by location or industry. Organizers described it as a “permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.” Many submissions, however, included mere criticisms or offhand remarks rather than explicit calls for harm.

Surge in Submissions By midday Saturday, the platform claimed almost 30,000 entries, featuring educators, journalists and everyday social media users. Several individuals reported harassment and employment repercussions after their profiles were highlighted, prompting legal concerns over potential defamation and privacy violations.

Abrupt Deactivation On Monday morning, visitors encountered a blank landing page, with no explanation or notice of intent to restore service. Web hosting records show the domain remains registered but inactive. Tech analysts suggest pressure from hosting providers or legal threats likely prompted the takedown.

Reactions and Legal Implications Civil liberties advocates warn that doxxing platforms like this one chill free expression and risk endangering lives. Employment lawyers note potential liability for disseminating unverified claims, especially as some featured individuals never posted celebratory messages. Meanwhile, conservative leaders who initially praised the site have issued silence or denials as it vanished.

Calls for Digital Accountability The site’s demise has reignited debate over platform responsibility and the boundaries of online accountability. Lawmakers from both parties are exploring legislation to curb nonconsensual data exposure, while advocates call for clearer takedown procedures for harmful content.

• END -