Six Afghan Workers Killed at Bagram as Trump Seeks Base Return

Lead Six Afghan civilian workers died late on Thursday night at Bagram Air Base in Parwan province, while President Donald Trump announced efforts to reclaim the former U.S. facility from Taliban control.
Nut Graf The overnight fatal shooting underscores ongoing security challenges around Bagram, once the largest U.S. military hub in Afghanistan, even as Washington publicly pursues negotiations to regain strategic access to the base.
Worker Deaths at Bagram
- Local officials report that six Afghan contract workers were killed by unidentified gunmen outside the base perimeter on the evening of September 18, 2025.
- The victims were employed in logistics support roles; details on their nationalities and exact circumstances remain under investigation.
- Afghan security forces have cordoned off the area and begun questioning witnesses; no group has claimed responsibility.
Trump Pushes for Base Reacquisition
- Speaking alongside U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London, President Trump stated the U.S. is “trying to get back” Bagram Air Base because “they need things from us” and highlighted its proximity to China’s nuclear sites.
- Trump criticized the 2021 withdrawal under his successor, arguing the base’s strategic value extends beyond Afghanistan.
- U.S. officials have neither confirmed formal negotiations with the Taliban nor disclosed proposed terms for the base’s return.
Security and Strategic Implications
- Bagram’s vast infrastructure, including airstrips and intelligence facilities, remains a coveted asset for counterterrorism and regional stability efforts.
- Persistent attacks on civilian contractors signal that Taliban security commitments may be limited, raising questions about the viability of any transfer agreement.
- Analysts warn that U.S. reentry could provoke competing regional powers, including China and Iran, while offering Afghanistan’s government a potential boost in security capacity.
Outlook
Afghan authorities and international partners now face the dual challenge of safeguarding remaining personnel around Bagram and clarifying Kabul’s role in any U.S.-Taliban arrangements. Further developments hinge on back-channel diplomacy and on-the-ground security assessments.
Categories
Autos and vehicles Beauty and fashion Business and finance Climate Entertainment Food and drink Games Health Hobbies and leisure Jobs and education Law and government Other Politics Science Shopping Sports Technology Travel and transportationRecent Posts
Comedian Robo Shankar Dies in Chennai After On-Set Collapse
Trump Appeals to Supreme Court to Dismiss Fed Governor Lisa Cook
McDonald’s Slashes Double Cheeseburger to 50 Cents for National Cheeseburger Day
Eugene Levy Joins The View to Promote New Travel Series
Trump Bitcoin Statue Unveiled Outside US Capitol, Coinciding with Fed Rate Cut
Oklo Shares Climb 4.7% on Renewed Nuclear Energy Optimism
Amex Hikes Platinum Fee to $895, Unveils $400 Resy Dining Credit
Bella Hadid Issues Health Update from Hospital Bed
Shannon Brown Death Rumor Sparks Viral Hoax Before Refutation
Tom Llamas Honored with Raúl Juliá Award at Hispanic Heritage Gala
Six Afghan Workers Killed at Bagram as Trump Seeks Base Return
Wake Forest Unveils Tuition-Free Initiative for North Carolina Students
Asteroid 2025 FA22 Skims Past Earth in Safe Flyby
McLlachlan Shines on GMA, Readies ‘Better Broken’ Release
Buttigieg Delivers Keynote at Indiana University on Transportation and Equity
Kelly Brook Teases Autumnal F&F Clothing Edit with Tesco Launch
ASML Stock Dips on Analyst Downgrade Despite New Stake Purchase
CrowdStrike Shares Rally 5% on September 18
Lauren Daigle Condemns Online Reactions to Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, Named New Candlelight Narrator
Rubio Joins Trump in London for $205 Billion UK Investment Deal
Tags
Archives
08/19/2025 (3) 08/20/2025 (64) 08/21/2025 (54) 08/22/2025 (37) 08/23/2025 (8) 08/24/2025 (24) 08/25/2025 (57) 08/26/2025 (43) 08/27/2025 (59) 08/28/2025 (43) 08/29/2025 (31) 08/30/2025 (15) 08/31/2025 (30) 09/01/2025 (175) 09/02/2025 (129) 09/03/2025 (164) 09/04/2025 (113) 09/05/2025 (72) 09/06/2025 (169) 09/07/2025 (162) 09/08/2025 (150) 09/09/2025 (176) 09/10/2025 (194) 09/11/2025 (194) 09/12/2025 (186) 09/13/2025 (207) 09/14/2025 (159) 09/15/2025 (175) 09/16/2025 (198) 09/17/2025 (196) 09/18/2025 (104)